After two months of sheltering in place, most brokers have figured out how to work from home. You’ve probably set up a workspace if you didn’t have one already, downloaded and mastered some type of virtual meeting software, and learned how to service your clients without going into the office. But have you actually been selling new business over the past few weeks? If not, perhaps you need to polish your phone sales skills.
The truth is that nobody knows how long the COVID-19 health crisis will last, but most people acknowledge that it’s not going away anytime soon. Even as some states begin to loosen their restrictions in an attempt to return to normal, a lot of people are understandably scared, and it will be a while before everyone is completely comfortable meeting face to face. In other words, for the foreseeable future, brokers will need to know not just how to take care how their current clients but how to sell new business from a distance.
As a result of the COVID-19 health crisis, lawmakers and federal regulators have made three recent changes to Health Savings Accounts, and one of those changes appears to be permanent.
As Forbes explains in a March 24 article, the IRS “has clarified that the deadline for making Individual Retirement Account and Health Savings Account contributions for the 2019 tax year has been extended to July 15, 2020.” This coincides with the new filing deadline for 2019 tax returns.
If it hasn’t happened already, your clients who have a Health Savings Account should soon receive form 5498-SA from their HSA administrator. This document shows their total contributions for the previous tax year and is sent out every year in late April or May. If an account holder takes advantage of this opportunity to make HSA contributions for 2019 through mid-July, he or she should receive an amended form 5498-SA from the HSA administrator following the contribution.
The state of Florida has more people enrolled in ACA individual coverage through Healthcare.gov than any other state in the nation, and it’s not particularly close. According to a list published by CMS:
This list does not include the 11 states and Washington D.C. which do not use the federal marketplace because they have set up their own state-based exchanges. (Click here to view a state-by-state list maintained by the Kaiser Family Foundation.) Those states account for about 25% of ACA enrollment according to Reuters.
People around the world are understandably nervous about COVID-19, also known as the Coronavirus. To date, nearly 900,000 people have tested positive for the rapidly-spreading respiratory illness, and the world-wide death toll now tops 40,000. In the United States, more than 190,000 cases had been reported as of April 1, with at least 4,000 deaths according to Worldometer, which tracks cases in real time. Unfortunately, all of those numbers are expected to rise.
Fear over the outbreak has caused the stock market to nosedive, the CDC to issue warnings against non-essential travel, schools and universities to cancel classes, and stores to sell out of hand sanitizer and disinfectant. It is also prompting questions about who will pay for Coronavirus testing and treatment.
It’s now been a full year since the individual mandate penalty was reduced to zero, so we wanted to take a quick look at the impact this change could have on the future of the Affordable Care Act.
One big effect of removing the penalty from the individual mandate is that it can no longer be deemed a tax, and for that reason a federal appeals court ruled the individual mandate unconstitutional. As we explain in a recent blog post [link to the post], the case has been sent back to a lower court to determine which ACA provisions, if any, can be severed from the mandate. The plaintiffs in the case are relying on the 2015 decision in King v. Burwell, which concluded that Congress intended for the individual mandate to work hand in hand with the guarantee issue provision and the premium tax credits, in making their argument that the entire law should be found unconstitutional. Here’s an excerpt from the 2015 decision:
On December 18, 2019, a federal appeals court in New Orleans ruled that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate is unconstitutional, calling into question the future of the entire law.
In a 2-1 decision, the court found that the individual mandate is no longer a tax since the penalty has been reduced to zero. As explained in an article by Kevin Daley with The National Interest, “the mandate is no longer raising revenue,” and therefore “cannot be justified as a tax.”
As AHCP first reported nearly two years ago, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has been working to replace everyone’s Medicare card and assign them a new Medicare number, known as a Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI). As of January 1, 2020, that process is complete and CMS will no longer process claims that are submitted with the old number.
As Experian explains, “The shift to MBIs is an effort to protect patient information and address the vulnerabilities that come with relying on Social Security Numbers (SSN) to verify patient identities.”
CMS elaborates on this goal, which is “To decrease Medicare Beneficiary vulnerability to identity theft by removing the SSN-based HICN from their Medicare identification cards and replacing the HICN with a new Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI).”
As a reminder, Medicare supplement plan F is no longer an option for new Medicare enrollees. Anyone aging into or signing up for Medicare on or after January 1, 2020, will not be able to purchase a Plan F Medigap plan. Plan C is also being eliminated as an option for new enrollees.
AHCP first wrote about this change in December 2018, so hopefully you were prepared, but we wanted to share a reminder since you may have clients—including existing Medicare supplement clients—who have questions about this development.
After years of lobbying by countless interest groups, Congress has finally killed the dreaded Cadillac tax.
Officially known as the High Cost Plan Tax (HCPT), this unpopular provision of the Affordable Care Act was originally scheduled to go into effect in 2018. The implementation date was pushed back multiple times (most recently to 2022) as lawmakers kept kicking the can down the road, but the failure to permanently repeal the tax created confusion for employers of all sizes.
A recent Boston Herald article describes the trouble that some seniors have paying for prescriptions in the Medicare coverage gap, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” The article tells the story of Judith Pais, who ran out of her medication in November and had to wait until the new year to purchase her prescriptions because the cost of her medications had “skyrocketed” from $120 per month to more than $500 after she entered her Part D plan’s coverage gap.
As the article explains, the coverage gap in 2019 begins after “a patient has spent $3,820 on covered drugs. Once you hit the gap, patients pay 25% of the plan’s cost for covered brand-name prescription drugs and 37% for generics.” Because of the high price of her drugs in the donut hole, Ms. Pais “immediately decided to cancel the prescription and used expired, leftover medication to get her through the rest of the year.”
As the article says, she’s not alone. According to Leigh Purvis with AARP’s Public Policy Institute, “the coverage gap has been slowly closing, but people are hitting the gap sooner and sooner because of sky-high drug prices.” The result is that people struggle to pay for prescriptions and may go without needed medication.